The unquantifiable devotion of centuries of the faithful ensured that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was lavished with a raft of titles: Theotokos, Star of the Sea, Queen of Heaven, Our Lady of Lourdes, of Fatima, Help of Christians, of Mount Carmel, of Sorrows, of Providence, of Guadalupe, of Lebanon, of Peace and there are many, many more. Each title has a deep and rich history. What they have in common is acknowledging Mary’s role in the story of human salvation.
Mary was, as we know well, a very young woman when she was engaged to Joseph. Her ‘Amen’ to the angelic visitation is the paradigmatic, Christian response. We actually know very little information about Mary and her motherhood from the scriptures and much has been made of the small amount that does appear. Inquisitiveness about Mary did not exist in the very early church, and this is reflected in the Gospels and Paul’s letters. In the generations that followed, however, the faithful’s appreciation of her generosity and her proximity to the divine, gave rise to speculation. There is an ancient adage, de Maria nunquam satis (Latin: one can never say enough about Mary)
Speculation and reflection (in some
cases) over many hundreds of years led to development of several key teachings
about Mary, and ultimately enshrined as dogma by the church: Mary as Theotokos
(Christ-bearer, or more commonly the Mother of God) in Ephesus in 431 AD and the
Immaculate Conception in 1854. Following the horrific wars of 1914 -1918 and 1939
- 1945 during which millions lost their lives and the rise of Communism, 'The Holy Spirit needed to remind the world
that human beings are body-souls made for transfiguration, not disfiguration by
starvation, torture, massacre and disposal like animal carcasses (Fr Michael
Tate)' Pius XII authoritatively defined of the Assumption of the Blessed
Virgin Mary in 1950.
The Assumption is a feast that was celebrated from the 7th century in Rome and while it attempts to describe what occurred after Mary died, it is a reflection on her whole life, her call, her parenthood, her faithfulness, her discipleship, her provoking of Jesus’ ministry, her companionship. She stands a model for the church, the model believer. We struggle with language to express Mary’s role, and given Mary’s extraordinary role in salvation history, we need to be able to link the human Mary and what was asked of her in life with the God who asked so much of her. Our experience and reflection tell us that on death, this wonderful and most unique creature in creation was invited in her entire humanity, body and soul into eternal communion with her creator. Would we expect anything less?
Today the Assumption gives us a foretaste of what we too can expect. Mary is indeed the model, the exemplar of discipleship and each of us could do no better than to follow her example. Today is the Feast of the Assumption.
Peter Douglas
The Assumption of
Mary: 12 Things to Know and Share
by Jimmy Akin
Aug. 15 is the Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin
Mary. Here are 12 things to know and share...
Aug. 15 is the solemnity of the Assumption of
Mary.
In the United States,
it is a holy day of obligation (in years when it does not fall on a Saturday or
Monday).
What is the Assumption
of Mary, how did it come to be defined, and what relevance does it have for our
lives?
Here are 12 things to
know and share...
1) What is the Assumption of Mary?
The Assumption of Mary
is the teaching that:
The Immaculate Mother
of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life,
was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory [Pius XII, Munificentissimus Deus 44].
2) What level of authority does this teaching
have?
This teaching was
infallibly defined by Pope Pius XII on Nov. 1, 1950 in the bull Munificentissimus
Deus (Latin, “Most Bountiful God”).
As Pius XII explained,
this is “a divinely revealed dogma” (ibid.).
This means that it is
a dogma in the proper sense. It is thus a matter of faith that has been
divinely revealed by God and that has been infallibly proposed by the
Magisterium of the Church as such.
3) Does that mean it is an “ex cathedra”
statement and that we have to believe it?
Yes. Since it is a
dogma defined by the pope (rather than by an ecumenical council, for example),
it is also an “ex cathedra” statement (one delivered “from the chair” of
Peter).
Because it is infallibly defined, it calls for the definitive assent of the faithful.Pope John Paul II explained:
The definition of the
dogma, in conformity with the universal faith of the People of God,
definitively excludes every doubt and calls for the express assent of all
Christians [General Audience, July 2, 1997].
Note that all
infallibly defined teachings are things we are obliged to believe, even if they
aren’t defined “ex cathedra” (by the pope acting on his own).
The bishops of the
world teaching in union with the pope (either in an ecumenical council or
otherwise) can also infallibly define matters, but these aren’t called “ex
cathedra” since that term refers specifically to the exercise of the pope’s
authority as the successor of St. Peter. (It’s Peter’s cathedra or
“chair” that symbolizes the pope’s authority.)
4) Does the dogma require us to believe that
Mary died?
It is the common
teaching that Mary did die. In his work, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, Ludwig
Ott lists this teaching as sententia communior (Latin, “the
more common opinion”).
Although it is the
common understanding of that Mary did die, and although her death is referred
to in some of the sources Pius XII cited in Munificentissimus Deus, he deliberately
refrained from defining this as a truth of the faith.
John Paul II noted:
On 1 November 1950, in
defining the dogma of the Assumption, Pius XII avoided using the term
"resurrection" and did not take a position on the question of the
Blessed Virgin’s death as a truth of faith.
The Bull Munificentissimus
Deus limits itself to affirming the elevation of Mary’s body
to heavenly glory, declaring this truth a "divinely revealed dogma."
5) Why should Mary die if she was free from
Original Sin and its stain?
Being free of Original
Sin and its stain is not the same thing as being in a glorified, deathless
condition.
Jesus was also free of
Original Sin and its stain, but he could—and did—die.
Expressing a common
view among theologians, Ludwig Ott writes:
For Mary, death, in
consequence of her freedom from original sin and from personal sin, was not a
consequence of punishment of sin.
However, it seems
fitting that Mary’s body, which was by nature mortal, should be, in conformity
with that of her Divine Son, subject to the general law of death.
6) What are the earliest surviving references
to Mary’s Assumption?
John Paul II noted:
The first trace of
belief in the Virgin's Assumption can be found in the apocryphal accounts entitled Transitus
Mariae [Latin, “The Crossing Over of Mary”], whose origin
dates to the second and third centuries.
These are popular and
sometimes romanticized depictions, which in this case, however, pick up an
intuition of faith on the part of God's People.
7) How did the recognition of Mary’s Assumption develop in the East?
John Paul II noted
There was a long
period of growing reflection on Mary’s destiny in the next world.
This gradually led the faithful to believe in the glorious raising of the Mother of Jesus, in body and soul, and to the institution in the East of the liturgical feasts of the Dormition [“falling asleep”—i.e., death] and Assumption of Mary.
8) How did Pius XII prepare for the definition of the
Assumption?
John Paul II noted:
In May 1946, with the
Encyclical Deiparae Virginis Mariae, Pius XII
called for a broad consultation, inquiring among the Bishops and, through them,
among the clergy and the People of God as to the possibility and opportuneness
of defining the bodily assumption of Mary as a dogma of faith.
The result was
extremely positive: only six answers out of 1,181 showed any reservations about
the revealed character of this truth.
9) What Scriptural basis is there for the
teaching?
John Paul II noted:
Although the New
Testament does not explicitly affirm Mary’s Assumption, it offers a basis for
it because it strongly emphasized the Blessed Virgin's perfect union with
Jesus’ destiny.
This union, which is
manifested, from the time of the Savior’s miraculous conception, in the
Mother’s participation in her Son’s mission and especially in her association
with his redemptive sacrifice, cannot fail to require a continuation after
death.
Perfectly united with
the life and saving work of Jesus, Mary shares his heavenly destiny in body and
soul.
There are, thus,
passages in Scripture that resonate with the Assumption, even though they do
not spell it out.
10) What are some specific Old Testament
passages?
Pope Pius XII pointed
to several passages that have been legitimately used in a “rather free” manner
to explain belief in the Assumption (meaning: these passages resonate with it
in various ways, but they don’t provide explicit proof):
Often there are
theologians and preachers who, following in the footsteps of the holy Fathers,
have been rather free in their use of events and expressions taken from Sacred
Scripture to explain their belief in the Assumption.
Thus, to mention only
a few of the texts rather frequently cited in this fashion, some have employed
the words of the psalmist:
"Arise, O Lord,
into your resting place: you and the ark, which you have sanctified" (Ps.
131:8);
and have looked upon
the Ark of the Covenant, built of incorruptible wood and placed in the Lord's
temple, as a type of the most pure body of the Virgin Mary, preserved and
exempt from all the corruption of the tomb and raised up to such glory in
heaven.
Treating of this
subject, they also describe her as the Queen entering triumphantly into the
royal halls of heaven and sitting at the right hand of the divine Redeemer(Ps.
44:10-14ff).
Likewise they mention
the Spouse of the Canticles "that goes up by the desert, as a pillar of
smoke of aromatical spices, of myrrh and frankincense" to be crowned (Song
3:6; cf. also 4:8, 6:9).
These are proposed as
depicting that heavenly Queen and heavenly Spouse who has been lifted up to the
courts of heaven with the divine Bridegroom [Munificentissimus Deus 26].
11) What are some specific New Testament
passages?
Pius XII continued:
Moreover, the
scholastic Doctors have recognized the Assumption of the Virgin Mother of God
as something signified, not only in various figures of the Old Testament, but
also in that woman clothed with the sun whom John the Apostle contemplated on
the Island of Patmos (Rev. 12:1ff).
Similarly they have
given special attention to these words of the New Testament: "Hail, full
of grace, the Lord is with you, blessed are you among women"(Luke 1:28),
since they saw, in the mystery of the Assumption, the fulfillment of that most
perfect grace granted to the Blessed Virgin and the special blessing that
countered the curse of Eve [Munificentissimus Deus 27].
12) How can we apply this teaching to our
everyday lives?
According to Pope
Benedict XVI:
By contemplating Mary
in heavenly glory, we understand that the earth is not the definitive homeland
for us either, and that if we live with our gaze fixed on eternal goods we will
one day share in this same glory and the earth will become more beautiful.
Consequently, we must
not lose our serenity and peace even amid the thousands of daily difficulties.
The luminous sign of Our Lady taken up into Heaven shines out even more
brightly when sad shadows of suffering and violence seem to loom on the
horizon.
We may be sure of it:
from on high, Mary follows our footsteps with gentle concern, dispels the gloom
in moments of darkness and distress, reassures us with her motherly hand.
Supported by awareness
of this, let us continue confidently on our path of Christian commitment wherever
Providence may lead us. Let us forge ahead in our lives under Mary's guidance [General Audience, August 16, 2006].
https://www.ncregister.com/blog/the-assumption-of-mary-12-things-to-know-and-share-27jd571n
No comments:
Post a Comment