On that day
you will understand that I am in my Father
and you in me and I in you.
Anybody who receives my commandments and keeps them
will be one who loves me;
and anybody who loves me will be loved by my Father,
and I shall love him and show myself to him.’
John 14:15 - 21
My father had always kissed me goodbye. I
was 12. Dad had driven us into town. As we both parted ways, I leant up to him
to kiss his cheek. The streets were relatively busy. He looked embarrassed and
said, 'I think you're too old for that.' It was one moment among thousands of
moments when a new understanding had dawned on me. This one in particular has
stayed with me. The revelation that came with my father's gentle, if
embarrassing, rebuff was that I was indeed growing up.
John 14 is part of Jesus' farewell
discourse. The disciples had already been struggling with Jesus' use of
figurative language, and now every question is answered by Jesus with seemingly
obscure rather than enlightening responses.
The excerpt follows Jesus' washing of his
disciples' feet. In this particular moment Jesus is pulling and dragging his
disciples into a new understanding of who he
is and who he will be - but this ultimate of all unveilings will not take
place until he has fulfilled what his Father has called him to do. The mystery
of his death will reveal a Jesus fully alive, who will perfectly image his
Father. And Jesus leaves an invitation to his beloved disciples, 'Keep my
commandments.' And for those that do, they will in turn will be loved lavishly
by both Father and Son, and in an even more extraordinary gesture, Jesus will
show himself.
One phrase that parents pull out of the
bag when the question is too hard, is, 'One day (when you grow up) you'll
understand'. Not so that the question will be forgotten, but to give time for
Mum or Dad to think how best to respond. John's Jesus deliberately holds off
giving direct answers to save his disciples undue anxiety, but in the end
(16:19ff) he speaks plainly:
“Now you
are speaking clearly and without figures of speech. Now we can see that
you know all things and that you do not even need to have anyone ask you
questions. This makes us believe that you came from God.”
John 16: 29
John is patently clear that the practice
of faith is loving others, and in doing so, loving God. What this highlights is
the responsibility we have as educators not to overwhelm our students with
esorteric and impenetrable theology or theory but to build on a foundation of
faith and experience meeting God face to face in others.
My father's response was very clear, and
while it felt like a slight, I soon understood why he felt that way. And that's okay. I am not at all embarrassed by
kissing and being kissed my sons, daughter and grandchildren, and should they
find it embarrassing, well, I'll do it anyway.
Peter Douglas
Under the Gaze of Dorothy Day:
Living with my grandmother’s faith
Kate
Hennessy
My
grandmother, Dorothy Day, believed that to lose one’s faith was the greatest
sadness. My mother, Tamar, Dorothy’s only child, believed to her dying day that
she had lost her own faith. What can I make of these two interwoven strands of
the most influential women in my life? How do I understand my own sense of
faith? Do I have faith?
I
have often felt that I needed a new vocabulary that speaks to my condition, as
the Quakers would say. In fact, I often do not understand what people mean when
they talk about “my faith”; they seem to speak a secret language that can feel
more punishing than uplifting, more like a proclamation than a way of being. Is
there some mysterious transformation that happens inside us when we make a
proclamation of faith that I am not seeing?
Growing
up with Dorothy and the Catholic Worker as part of my family, I picked up quite
a tangle of odd phrases while lingering around the grownups: voluntary and
involuntary poverty, Christian anarchism, pacifism, the works of mercy, houses
of hospitality, the primacy of conscience. I made what I could of them, growing
into them with each passing stage from childhood to young adulthood and now
middle age, having interior arguments along the way.
Voluntary
poverty was for many years a bone I chewed on as I felt the burden of being
raised in involuntary poverty, though this was not so easy to define. At one
level, my mother chose a life of voluntary poverty, and it came naturally to
her. She did not need much in the way of material goods other than her gardens
and tools, her looms and spinning wheels, her kitchen and her books. But as a
single mother of nine, she spent years worrying about whether she could put
enough food on the table or celebrate Christmas or fix the car or keep the
house warm and the water pipes from freezing in the brutal Vermont winters.
But
nothing from my upbringing engendered the same weighty feeling and confusion
that the basic question of faith did.
Two
faces of faith
When
I was a teenager, I began visiting my grandmother at the Catholic Worker at
Maryhouse on East Third Street in New York City. I would travel down by bus
from Vermont during school breaks, leaving the hills and trees, the rhythm of
the distinct seasons and a life on the farm that I never expected to leave, to
enter the grit of New York City in the 1970s, when it was teetering on the edge
of bankruptcy. I would be greeted at the double doors of glass and wrought iron
by women who were sometimes delighted to see me, sometimes not, then walk up
the stairs to that room on the second floor, my grandmother’s room, where she
spent the last three years of her life.
Her
failing health and loss of mobility became my gain as I was able to spend more
time with her, a time of listening to her ruminate on her past, often laughing
as she did so, or as she read letters from people around the world—a priest in
Uruguay, a friend from Mississippi or a member of an ashram in India. Even as a
16-year-old I felt the pull of the magnet that was my grandmother. But I also
began to feel a struggle within myself. I was drawn by the power and luminosity
of her faith, but I was deeply loyal and more naturally bent toward my mother’s
way of being: unadorned, unspoken and rooted in the natural world.
It
was not until I read my grandmother’s diaries that I more clearly understood the
pain Dorothy endured as she watched her daughter—the daughter whose birth led
to Dorothy’s conversion—leave that very church. In 1965, Dorothy wrote: “I
consider the loss of faith the greatest of disasters—the greatest unhappiness.
How can one help grieving over friends and relatives. How necessary to pray
without ceasing for them.”
I
know she was speaking of us. She was so very careful to never impose this pain
on me. She never once, that I can recall, suggested that I go to Mass, though
when I did, it was so important to her that she would write of it in her diary.
What delicacy, what respect she had for a teenager, I can now see.
But
at 16 all I could feel was her penetrating and unnervingly direct gaze, a gaze
well known by those who often found themselves pinned by it. (Tamar referred to
it as “the Look,” which she had, too, though she was unaware of it.) Under that
gaze, I felt I had no chance of experiencing anything of the nature and power
of my grandmother. Under that gaze, I felt unworthy, particularly when she
asked me after I graduated from high school, “Now, what are you going
to do, Katy?” It is unfortunate that at that moment all I could see was what
she had accomplished, not all those steps, whether deliberate or wildly
inspired, she had taken to get there. But truthfully, for years, I wanted
nothing to do with a church that could leave my mother feeling she had no place
in it, that left her with a burden that seemed insupportable.
I
believed for decades, as I think my mother also believed, that in the face of
Dorothy’s faith anything less could only be felt as a lack of faith. The force
of her faith was so strong and sure. How could Tamar have felt there was any
other way for her to express her own? This tension was passed down to me, and I
am learning how to untangle the strands on my own terms. Unlike Tamar, I was not
raised in the church; and unlike Dorothy, I am slow and cautious in my approach
to faith.
Ultimately,
I believe that Tamar did not lose her faith and that I simply grew up with two
outwardly different expressions of what that faith can mean. Dorothy provided
the ritualistic expression of a deeply held faith she came to as an adult, and
she lived a life that acted this out in an open and full-bodied way. Though a
cradle Catholic, Tamar came to live a quiet faith, unadorned by ritual, and yet
one that also imbued her daily life. Dorothy’s gestures were seen by many;
Tamar’s were seen only by those who knew her intimately. My mother had an
abiding belief in the goodness of life and of people, a keen sense, awareness
and perceptivity of those—human, creatures or flora—we live with day to day.
“Pay attention!” she would scold me. Pay attention to what is going on, both
the joy and the suffering. Be with each other, be there, show up. Tamar’s was a
faith that held at its heart the belief that with loving kindness, and perhaps
good soil, we will all flourish.
Between
mother and daughter
At a
fundamental level, Dorothy believed she could see the face of God in those who
are destroyed, rejected and forgotten by society, and Tamar believed we all are
children of God. What clearer expressions of faith do I need? Entire treatises
could be written on either statement. And so I came to understand that what
lingered within me, this history of grandmother and mother, contained no
divide, no conflict, no exile.
I
have spent the past seven years writing about this relationship between mother
and daughter, and many people have asked me what surprised me most during the
process. Did I learn anything that I had not known? Dorothy and Tamar were both
unusually direct and honest storytellers, so there were no great revelations.
But there has been a surprise, and it lies within myself: a deepening sense of
falling in love with the two of them not only for their profound love for each
other but also for the pain that existed between them. And with this comes my
own burgeoning sense of faith—even if I have yet to be able to define this.
Of course, this should have been no surprise at all. I had
begun the journey believing, knowing that no one can truly examine Dorothy
Day’s life without being led to examine one’s own. But the depth and meaning of
this surprise are a mystery to me, and this mystery is still unfolding, which
is as it should be.
-------------------------
Kate Hennessy is the author of The
World Will Be Saved by Beauty: An Intimate Portrait of My Grandmother. She
is the youngest of Dorothy Day’s nine grandchildren. This article first
appeared in America, 9 May 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment